A fresh GAO report says the nation’s largest cash assistance program fails to incentivize states to help people find work.
The 1996 federal welfare reform law is discouraging states and localities from experimenting with some of the most promising ideas for getting people back to work, according to a latest report by the U.S. Government Accountability Office (GAO). The independent auditing arm of Congress found that incentives baked into the nation’s largest cash assistance program — Improvised Assistance for Needy Families (TANF)– actually undermine efforts to employ the poor.
The problem, according to the report, is that the current system encourages states to concentrate on activities that help them meet a flawed federal spectacle measure: the work participation rate. The measure, said Elizabeth Lower-Basch, a welfare policy analyst at the Center on Law and Social Policy, doesn’t reflect how many people on TANF are working, or even doing the things most likely to lead to work. ",It’s a process measure,", she says. ",It doesn’t look at whether people get jobs.",
Instead, the participation rate requires states to make sure that at least half of eligible TANF families participate in one or more prescribed activities — such as searching for work or job training — for a certain number of hours per month. The report also notes that the measure adversely encourages TANF agencies to concentrate on job-ready participants or participants that might not need as much help as ",hard-to-employ", participants who have health problems, disabilities, criminal records, dependence on drugs, limited education or a responsibility to care for a disabled relative. In either case, states show up to be meeting the letter of the law, but not its intent.
To better promote innovative, research-driven employment approaches, the GAO report points to four evidence-based strategies, detailed below, being implemented in Ten places around the country: subsidized employment, treatment coupled with employment services, career pathways and modified work very first.
With subsidized employment, public funds create or support makeshift work for someone who would otherwise be unemployed. One example is the San Francisco Jobs Now! program, which step by step reduces its contribution to a participant’s wage over five months. Public funds cover 100 percent of wages in the very first month, 75 percent in the 2nd month and $1,000 per month for the next three months. Employers have to agree to attempt to retain the participant once the subsidy runs out. San Francisco administrators told the GAO that the employee retention rate is inbetween 75 percent and 80 percent. Subsidized employment strategies are also being attempted in Los Angeles, Erie County, N.Y., and Kentucky.
Under treatment and employment services, officials attempt to address barriers to employment, such as mental health needs, substance manhandle or a physical disability, while helping people look for work. Utah’s Licensed Clinical Therapist Program still assists people with job searches and resume building, but also offers a clinical assessment of mental health problems and clinical therapy sessions. These services are also suggested in Fresh York City and Ramsey County, Minn.
Under the career pathways model, TANF participants receive basic education while also learning abilities needed for a specific job and industry, usually with guidance from local employers. In Washington state, 34 community and technical colleges train people in classrooms for careers with a demonstrated market request in the region, such as health care, early childhood education and advanced manufacturing. Kentucky and Minnesota are also experimenting with career pathways models.
",Work very first", refers to mandatory work-related activities, such as job searching, rather than education and training that might lead to a job later on. The district’s modified work-first program differentiates people who are ready for a job and those who need to upgrade their abilities, practice or education before looking for work.
The GAO review of Ten jurisdictions experimenting with employment-focused approaches underscores a paradox: All these programs aim to place people in work, but administrators from half the programs said they didn’t prioritize meeting the federal work requirement. They could afford to do that, in part, because these jurisdictions are part of larger TANF programs with other components that concentrate on the participation rate.
Despite the fact that research suggests the highlighted approaches might be some of the best ideas today for helping the poor get jobs, administrators in three of the jurisdictions said it would be difficult to secure state funding for their programs — in light of other requests for the same money – if they embarked today. The GAO authors concluded that it is unlikely the lessons learned from these programs will be widely adopted until Congress switches the law that created TANF.
The federal government also ought to suggest incentives to states for evaluating experimental TANF programs, the GAO authors wrote. Since the work participation rate fails to track employment outcomes, the report also suggested that TANF agencies need to conduct extra research on which approaches work best. Presently, the federal government isn’t funding state research centered on employment-focused programs in TANF, and states are unlikely to take it upon themselves to do it.
There are other good reasons why TANF agency goes would be reluctant to conduct a scientific assessment of their programs — besides the money, obviously. Rigorous evaluation comes with the political risk that it will expose a current program isn’t working. Plus, the randomized design in evaluations means that some needy residents will end up in control groups and won’t benefit from a potentially effective service. But the thickest hurdle? The funding for a examine is ",coming out of money you could have been spending on actual services,", Lower-Basch said, ",which is always a hard case to make.",
LATEST HEALTH & HUMAN SERVICES HEADLINES
STD Rates Reach Record High in America
In Cybersecurity Fight, Governments Leave Hospitals Behind
On Birth Control, States: Two Trump Administration: 0
Congress Offers More Short-Term CHIP Funding As At Least One State Prepares to Use Its Own
Obamacare Enrollment Going Strong Despite Funding Cuts and Confusion
Infection Lapses Are Rampant in Nursing Homes, But Penalty Is Uncommon
The Medical Marijuana Industry Has a Staff Problem in Hawaii: Not Enough
Maternity Wards Are Disappearing From Rural America
Ohio’s Bad Idea for Boosting Welfare-to-Work
Without any thought to unintended consequences, Ohio legislators have created a hurting pay-for-performance welfare-to-work program. READ MORE
Fresh ON THE PODCAST
Will 2018 Indeed Be a Big Year for Women in Politics? An Experienced Weighs In.
MORE FROM Health & Human Services
Once a National Model for Helping Panhandlers, Albuquerque’s Fresh Law Could Land Them in Jail
Its fresh ordinance exemplifies a shift in how cities across the country are attempting to target panhandlers.
Health Care News You May Have Missed in 2017
Albeit it seemed like it at times, Obamacare wasn’t the only health policy up for debate this year.
Maternity Wards Are Disappearing From Rural America
As rural hospitals fight to keep their doors open, the high cost of ob-gyn wards makes them one of the very first things cut.
Foreshadowing Food Stamp Switches, Feds Seek States’ Advice
The Trump administration has begun the process of tightening welfare programs. Many conservative states have been waiting for a moment like this for years.
Maine’s Obamacare Vote Revives Expansion Debate in Some States
Last month’s election has re-energized Obamacare advocates. Meantime in Maine, the matter is being complicated by Gov. Paul LePage, who has vowed not to implement an expansion until lawmakers showcase how they’ll fund it.
Spending Deal Offers Short-Term CHIP Ease, But Uncertainty Looms
The bill signed by President Trump helps states keep the Children’s Health Insurance Program afloat, but it doesn’t suggest any reassurance that kids won’t lose their health care in 2018.